Tuesday, October 29, 2013

JW Mason — Functional Finance and Sound Finance

Introduction 
Anyone who who has been following debates on fiscal policy over the past few years will have noticed that, among those who think fiscal policy can be effective, there are two distinct camps. There is a minority who think that fiscal policy is not subject to a budget constraint; that is, that as long as a government borrows in its own currency, its existing liabilities never limit its ability to adjust taxes and spending to bring the economy to full employment. And there are the majority who think that governments are subject to a binding budget constraint; that is, that while adjusting spending and taxes can in principle be used to bring about full employment, it may be impossible or undesirable to do so when the level of government debt is already high. In this view, maintaining full employment should be left to monetary policy. Following Abba Lerner, I call the first position "functional finance" and the second position "sound finance."
I believe there are important differences between these two positions. But I also believe that these differences have not been clearly articulated, and as a result these debates between them been unproductive. It is my view that there are no important differences in terms of economic theory between the two positions. A perfect application of a functional finance policy rule and of a sound finance policy rule are indistinguishable. The difference between the camps is with respect to policy errors -- which errors are most likely, and which are most costly.
The Slack Wire
Functional Finance and Sound Finance
JW Mason

4 comments:

Roger Erickson said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Roger Erickson said...

Stephanie Kelton ‏@StephanieKelton
'Trying to reconcile Functional Finance and "sound finance" is a dead end. Good luck getting there w/out sector balances.'

JW Mason said...

The funny thing Roger is that I am actually on your side. Sometimes the same idea can be presented in different ways.

Roger Erickson said...

JW Mason: "The funny thing Roger is that I am actually on your side. Sometimes the same idea can be presented in different ways."

Then my apologies for the innuendo. I'll remove it.